SilentConsensus™ Product Overview

See how privacy-preserving asset partition works for your practice

Confidential Materials Notice

The materials you are requesting contain confidential, proprietary, and patent-pending information of SilentConsensus Holdings, LLC. They are provided solely for evaluating a potential professional, pilot, business, licensing, or commercial relationship with SilentConsensus.

These restrictions do not apply to information that you can show was already publicly known, lawfully known to you without confidentiality obligations, independently developed without use of the materials, or rightfully received from a third party without confidentiality obligations.

14 slides — SilentConsensus™ Product Overview Download PDF ↓
Slide 1 of 14

SilentConsensus™

Asset Partition

Privacy-Preserving Estate Division

Blind Selections, Instant Partition Results, Final Resolution in Attorney-Controlled Case Files

Pre-Build Validation Deck — April 2026

Slide 2 of 14

The Problem with Traditional Estate Division

⚠ Traditional Approach

  • Attorney asks each sibling "What do you want?"
  • Everyone hears everyone's answers
  • Siblings change picks based on spite or strategy
  • Arguments erupt when two want the same item
  • Attorney becomes involuntary mediator of emotions
  • Process drags on for months

🔒 What SilentConsensus Changes

  • Each sibling selects privately — no one else sees
  • Other participants do not know who picked what; attorney sees only the aggregate partition map until private verification
  • Selections are cryptographically transformed
  • Platform is designed not to store who picked what
  • Only aggregate outcomes revealed afterwards
  • Attorney receives a clean partition map, not drama
  • Selection-submission data is deleted or retained only in non-attributed form per attorney-set retention policy; final assignment records are maintained by counsel
Slide 3 of 14

The Scenario — Smith Estate

The Smith family needs to divide their parents' estate among three adult children: Sarah (eldest), Michael (middle), and David (youngest). Ms. Rivera is the estate attorney.

The Estate — 10 Items, $1.1M Total

Family Home$450K
Lake Cabin$180K
Investment Portfolio$200K
Savings Account$120K
Jewelry Collection$40K
Sedan$35K
Art Collection$30K
Boat$25K
Antique Furniture$15K
Grand Piano$12K
Slide 4 of 14

Step 1 — Binding Agreement & Session Setup

Before anyone makes selections, all participants sign a pre-session binding agreement.

Pre-Session Binding Agreement

  1. Under the pre-session agreement, uncontested items (single claimant) may be treated as final assignments.
  2. Unclaimed items (zero claimants) will be liquidated and proceeds split equally.
  3. Contested items (multiple claimants) proceed to mediation.
  4. Selections are locked once submitted and verified through the cryptographic receipt workflow.
  5. Each participant verifies selections via commitment receipt.

What if someone selects everything? They get stuck with it. Claim the Boat and nobody else does — it may be treated as yours under the pre-session agreement, including taxes and storage costs. Overclaiming is self-punishing.

What if someone refuses to participate? The session expires. Selection-submission data is deleted or retained only in non-attributed form under the configured retention policy. No partial results. Attorney proceeds through their standard process.

Slide 5 of 14

Step 2 — Each Sibling Selects Privately

During the partition-computation phase, other participants do not see individual selections, and the attorney receives only the aggregate partition map until private receipt verification.

What happens under the hood:

  • 🔒 Selections are cryptographically transformed on participant devices before submission
  • 🔐 The platform does not store identity-linked plaintext selections
  • 👥 Fixed-size payloads reduce network/message-size inference
  • ✅ All items must be explicitly marked before submitting
Slide 6 of 14

What the Server Actually Sees

Server Database

group_id: 'session_x7k2'
hash: 'c7a2f9...3b1e'
hash: '91d4b8...7c0f'
hash: 'e5f201...a4d2'
hash: '3b8c72...f1e9'

NO identity-bearing participant field in preference-submission records
NO participant-attributed plaintext item names
NO stored participant-to-selection linkage

Privacy Guarantees

  • Cryptographic Transformation — Selections are cryptographically transformed on participant devices before submission
  • Non-Attribution Architecture — No identity-bearing fields in preference-submission records — platform is designed not to store participant-to-selection attribution
  • Fixed-Size Cover Traffic — Fixed-size payloads reduce network/message-size inference; padding is not counted as a claim
  • Commitment Receipt — Tamper-evident proof stored on participant's device; platform stores only non-attributed verification data
Slide 7 of 14

Step 3 — Each Person Gets a Receipt

After submitting, each participant receives a cryptographic receipt on their phone. They save it as a PDF.

✅ Submission Complete — Items Locked In

QR CODE

Session: Smith Estate Division
Date: 2026-04-15 14:32:07 CDT
Hash: a7f3c9d2e1b4...8k2m

What Is This Receipt?

A tamper-evident record of what you submitted. Generated on participant's device; platform stores only non-attributed verification data.

If you claimed an uncontested item, this receipt supports verification under the pre-session agreement. If anyone tries to fake a receipt, verification will fail instantly.

Keep it safe! Download/save the PDF. This receipt is your local proof of what you submitted. The platform does not store a participant-attributed copy.

Slide 8 of 14

Step 4 — Attorney Receives the Partition Map

All 3 participants submitted. The system computed the partition. Attorney does NOT know who claimed what yet.

Contested

2 items — mediation needed

Family Home Multiple claims · $450K
Lake Cabin Multiple claims · $180K

Uncontested

6 items — single claimant each

Jewelry $40K
Sedan $35K
Savings $120K
Investment $200K
Art $30K
Piano $12K

Unclaimed

2 items — no claims filed

Boat $25K
Furniture $15K

Next: Attorney contacts all participants: "Session complete. Please schedule a private meeting and bring your receipt."

Slide 9 of 14

Step 5 — Verification in the Attorney's Office

Attorney meets each participant privately (in-person or video call). Takes about 2–3 minutes per person.

1

Participant opens receipt on their phone

2

Attorney points phone camera at QR code

3

Tool shows participant-disclosed what they claimed

4

Server confirms: commitment is registered

5

Attorney records assignment in case file

✅ Verified — Receipt matches registered submission from 2026-04-15 14:32:07

Sarah's Verified Claims:

Family HomeCONTESTED
Jewelry CollectionUNCONTESTED ✓
Savings AccountUNCONTESTED ✓
Grand PianoUNCONTESTED ✓
Slide 10 of 14

Step 6 — Complete Assignment Record

After verifying all three siblings, the attorney's case file contains the complete, verified assignment map for title transfers.

Attorney-Controlled Case File — Smith Estate

ItemAssigned ToStatus
Jewelry CollectionSarah SmithAssigned
Savings AccountSarah SmithAssigned
Grand PianoSarah SmithAssigned
Art CollectionMichael SmithAssigned
SedanDavid SmithAssigned
Investment PortfolioDavid SmithAssigned
Family HomeSarah + MichaelMediation
Lake CabinMichael + DavidMediation
BoatLiquidate
Antique FurnitureLiquidate

Final assignment records are maintained by the attorney. SilentConsensus is designed not to store participant-attributed selection records.

Slide 11 of 14

The Bottom Line

Without SilentConsensus

  • 10 items debated openly
  • 3–6 meetings over several months
  • Every selection visible to all parties
  • Emotional arguments at every meeting

With SilentConsensus

  • 6 items resolved instantly — zero discussion
  • Only 2 items need mediation
  • Minimizes the number of meetings to settle an estate
  • No one sees anyone else's selections
  • Complete verified record for title transfers

After the Process

  • 🗑 Selection-submission data is deleted or retained only in non-attributed form according to the attorney-set retention policy
  • 📄 Each participant's receipt remains on their own device as tamper-proof evidence
  • 📂 Attorney's case file contains the final assignment record for title transfers
  • ⚖ If the system is ever subpoenaed: SilentConsensus is designed not to have participant-to-item selection records to produce
Slide 12 of 14

Under the Hood — Technology & Platform

Client-Side Cryptographic Transformation

Selections are transformed on participant devices before submission. The platform is designed not to store participant-attributed plaintext selections.

Non-Attribution Architecture

No user_id or identity-bearing field exists in preference-submission records. The platform is designed not to store participant-to-selection attribution.

QR Code Verification

Compact binary-encoded QR payload. Attorney scans with phone camera — instant verification in 2–3 seconds.

Configurable Non-Attributed Retention

Selection-submission data is deleted or retained only in non-attributed form according to the attorney-set retention policy. Non-content audit logs may persist.

Works on Any Device

iOS Safari 15.4+, Android Chrome 93+, desktop browsers. No app install required — just open a link.

Fixed-Size Cover Traffic

Fixed-size payloads reduce network/message-size inference; padding is not counted as a claim.

Tamper-Evident Receipts

Cryptographic commitment hash. Any modification to selections invalidates the receipt instantly.

Immutable Audit Log

System events logged (session created, completed, data destroyed). Contains no participant-attributed selection data. Non-content audit log may persist.

Patent Pending (U.S. Provisional Application Filed)

Provisional patent application filed with USPTO in March 2026; claims are subject to amendment during nonprovisional prosecution.

Cloud Hosting (Configuration Dependent)

Hosted on reputable cloud infrastructure with enterprise-grade controls. Specific compliance certifications depend on final deployment configuration.

Current system limits: up to 500 items and 20 participants per session. Modern browser required (no app install). Lost receipts cannot be recovered — the platform does not store participant-attributed copies. SilentConsensus™ is a technology tool, not a legal service.

Slide 13 of 14

Development Roadmap

Mar 9, 2026

Provisional Patent Filed

Filed with USPTO

Apr – May

Core Engine + API

Cryptographic Transformation Interface, partition logic, commitment receipts, PostgreSQL + audit log

Jun – Jul

UI + Deployment

React participant UI + Admin portal, QR code receipt + PDF generation, Docker deployment, SSL/TLS

Aug – Sep

Beta Testing + Billing

End-to-end testing with real sessions, first 2–3 pilot attorney customers, subscription + per-session billing

Oct 2026

Nonprovisional Patent Filing

Go/no-go decision on utility patent application

Nov 2026

Go Live

Production launch

Dec 2026

Hypercare

Hypercare for new clients

Q1 2027

v1.1 Enhancements

Email alerts, magic link login for attorneys, court-ready PDF report generation

Slide 14 of 14

We're Looking for Attorneys to Validate Workflow and Pricing

Solution is still in the "pre-build" phase. Receive 1 month of free unlimited usage once released.

contact@silentconsensus.com

Interested in learning more?

Get in Touch →